NEGOTIATING BORDER SECURITY: DIPLOMACY, INTER-AGENCYCOORDINATION, AND TRANSNATIONAL CRIME GOVERNANCE ATTHE KENYA–TANZANIA NAMANGA ONE-STOP BORDER POST
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22704859Keywords:
Transborder surveillance, Border security, Securitization, One-Stop Border Posts, East Africa, Crime management, NamangaAbstract
Purpose of Study: This study examines how transborder surveillance approaches influence crime management at the Namanga One-Stop Border Post between Kenya and Tanzania. It focuses on the contribution of the Multi-Agency Command Centre, electronic Customs Manifest Systems, and Image Recognition Technologies, while exploring how institutional coordination and shared security governance shape surveillance effectiveness.
Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive mixed-methods case study design covering the period 2020–2025. Quantitative data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to border officials and stakeholders, while qualitative data were obtained through key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS, and qualitative data were analysed thematically.
Findings: The findings demonstrate that integrated surveillance approaches have strengthened crime management at Namanga. The Multi-Agency Command Centre improved information sharing, operational response, and intelligence-led coordination. Electronic Customs Manifest Systems enhanced early detection of suspicious consignments and reduced manual inspection delays through risk-based targeting. Image Recognition Technologies improved traveller identification and deterrence. However, effectiveness remains constrained by staffing shortages, technological incompatibilities, incomplete data, uneven technical training, and governance gaps. The study establishes that surveillance effectiveness depends more on institutional integration, shared intelligence, and coordinated authority than on technology alone. Stronger governance, interoperable systems, and sustained institutional support are therefore essential for improving border security outcomes.
Conclusion: Transborder surveillance can significantly enhance crime management when supported by effective inter-agency coordination and shared security governance. The study recommends strengthening the authority and resources of the Multi-Agency Command Centre, harmonizing surveillance systems, improving technical capacity, and embedding human rights safeguards to promote sustainable and accountable border security within the East African Community.
Downloads
References
Fakhri. (2020). Customs system and using advanced technologies in customs. reposiTUm (TU Wien). https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2020.73187
Graziani, C. (2026). Technosecuritization across the Atlantic: Digital migration governance in the European Union and the United States. Computer Law & Security Review, 62, 106369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2026.106369
Hands, A. S. (2022). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research: An illustration. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.10645
Hasan, M. M., & Fardous, Md. (2022). Advanced computing–enabled secure financial information systems for real-time fraud detection in U.S. digital payments: A quantitative analysis. American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions, 02(02), 97–133. https://doi.org/10.63125/9mv2qd37
Idris, A., Lenshie, N. E., Onuh, P. A., & Miapyen, B. S. (2024). Community-based border policing: Towards complementing border surveillance strategy in countering human trafficking on the Nigeria–Niger border. Journal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096241228770
Kihato, C. W. (2025). Securitization is (normal) politics: Epistemological insights from Kenya’s forced migration and security experience. Migration Studies, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaf008
Kuldova, T., Gundhus, H., & Wathne, C. (2024). Introduction to volume I: Algorithmic governance, policing and intelligence in the global big data era. Palgrave’s Critical Policing Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68326-8_1
Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2021). Accountability and inter-organizational collaboration within the state. Public Management Review, 24(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1963822
Masengeli, G., Hansen, S. J., & Khayundi, F. (2026). Effect of Local Peace Committees on Border Security Management in the Mandera Triangle, Kenya. African Journal of Security and Strategic Studies, 88–131. https://doi.org/10.67371/ajsss.v1i2.13
Mwakangale, L. J., & Rwabishugi, L. (2024). Enhancing national security: Integrated border management strategies at the namanga border in Arusha Tanzania. The Accountancy and Business Review, 16(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.59645/abr.v16i2.197
Ogbu, S. U., Shumba, K., & Abimbola, A. B. (2023). Breaking the silos: Role of intergovernmental and interagency collaboration in combating insecurity in South Africa and Nigeria. Palgrave Studies of Public Sector Management in Africa, 67–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17863-4_4
Omary, L. A. (2025). Examining the impact of non-tariff barriers on intra-regional trade in East Africa: A case study of namanga one stop border post-Tanzania. - The Open University of Tanzania Institutional Repository. Out.Ac.Tz. https://doi.org/http://repository.out.ac.tz/4801/1/Latifah%20A.%20Omary%20-%20Revised_Dissertation%2C%20June%202025%20%281%29.pdf
Onono, P., Omondi, F., & Mwangangi, A. (2024). Impacts of regional integration and market liberalization on bilateral trade balances of selected east African countries: Potential implications of the African Continental Free Trade Area. Economies, 12(6), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060155
Paasi, A., Ferdoush, M. A., Jones, R., Murphy, A. B., Agnew, J., Ochoa Espejo, P., Fall, J. J., & Peterle, G. (2022). Locating the territoriality of territory in border studies. Political Geography, 95, 102584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102584
Sadık, G., & Kaya, C. (2020). AB göç politikalarının ve Sınır Yönetiminin Güvenlikleştirilmesinde Gözetim Teknolojilerinin Rolü. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.856932
Sullivan, G., & Meerssche, D. (2024). The legal infrastructures of UK border control—Cerberus and the dispositif of speculative suspicion. German Law Journal, 25(8), 1308–1342. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.76
Vohra, A. (2023). Social order in the age of artificial intelligence: The use of technology in migration governance and decision-making. Open.Library.Ubc.Ca. https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0437225
Wagner, J. (2021). The European Union’s model of integrated border management: Preventing transnational threats, cross-border crime and irregular migration in the context of the EU’s security policies and strategies. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 59(4), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2021.1999650
Waring, S., Balmer, N., Langley, H., Williams, K., Chantler, E., & Power, N. (2026). Embedding collaboration in disaster response: Insights from the joint emergency services interoperability principles. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 133, 105992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.105992
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lydia Gatheru (Author); Dr. Fred Ochieng, PhD, Dr. Joshua Milui, PhD (Supervisor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
